Focus challenge and Creating over Reacting
Table of Contents
Hi š
Since the last newsletter I wasn’t unproductive.
Two out of those three weeks I consumed very little media, did a lot of
programming1 and busied myself.
I noticed two things:
- While programming, I displayed some of the same obsessive tendencies that I dislike in consuming media (don’t want to stop even though I should, I do it instead of something else I promised to do, etc.) The behavior is similar. Only how I feel about the activity differs.
- I worked on the wrong things. My efforts where spent on a wide array of topics. Whatever seemed relevant at the moment. Most of it was unimportant and almost none of it aligned with my current priority.
Last week, I started what I call a focus challenge, to address point number two. My subject in focus is developing a stock market strategy š©šŖ . This was my declared priority before, I just didn’t work on it.
Focus challenge definition
I commit to work on a topic (a subject) for a period of time. The leading principle is: Stay on-topic at all times. That means any task, project, action, media shall pertain pertain to the selected topic. Anything off-topic is to be noted for later without receiving much attention.
Exceptions apply for established habits, outside work, chores, FFF, etc.
Some applications of this principle:
- I hid all my off-topic projects.
- I only listed to on-topic audiobooks and podcasts.
- I only read on-topic books.
- I only listened to instrumental music.
- I did not process any off-topic notes in my note-taking system.
- I did not make any online purchases.
For this past week the challenge has already worked really well!
What I’m working on #
For context, see /now.
I attended the first in a series of private lectures from Torsten Bƶttcher. He teaches the stock market strategy he has been successfully utilzing for some years.
Consequently I’m applying what I’ve learned (selling naked puts) in paper trading2.
I’m also developing my own type of trading journal in emacs org-mode. As one great trader said:
The fruits of your success will be in direct ratio to the honesty and sincerity of your own effort in keeping your own records, doing your own thinking, and reaching your own conclusions. ā Jesse Livermore
Commitments #
My ongoing commitments:
- Focus challenge until December 19th
- No buying sweets and such until the end of the year
- Publishing this newsletter every Sunday, no matter what
I want to encourage you to call me out, if there is no Newsletterš. Stakes3 will be added soonā¢ļø.
Challenges #
Applying a specific learning/philosophy/trick for a week.
Last one #
The last challenge was: Applying data hierarchies
First up: I did not do any of the tasks I listed. I spent some time with each of them, but didn’t take them to completion. I will not do this kind of challenge in the future. It neither worked for me nor this newsletter.
Next one #
Don’t react. Create!
Instead of reacting automatically, I want to pause and choose to create something. A positive feeling, a relationship, an opportunity, a moment of presence. Anything I want to create.
The section that inspired this.
Quoting from Crazy Good, by Steve Chandler:
This guy needs to be taught a lesson
I receive a negative, nasty email.
Someone hates me. Thatās my first thought.
So then I think revenge. How could I be hated? How can that be? My ego has to be protected from that, even though I know, deep down, that my ego is, as Ken Wilber says, kept in existence by a collection of emotional insults. Still. What would be a clever put-down? How can I humiliate this idiot and show him he should not be messing with me at this level, words against words?
This guy said heād purchased one of my very first audio programs and it was awful. It was worse than awful. My voice was so slow and monotonous he couldnāt stand it.
āIt made me want to kill myself,ā he said.
Wow. Thatās a heavy criticism.
So . . . How should I defend myself?
I start to compose a reply. Iāll tell him that only idiots want what he wantsāsome ranting and raving motivational type guy who spits spittle from a red face hyped with passion popping out of it. Some raving secular evangelist selling a speed-rap of monetized passion.
Iāll say my audio is for thoughtful people, so I speak slowly. Iāll tell him I put a lot of time into my words. I donāt want to insult the listener by sounding like Iām in a shouting contest. Iāll say if you need to be motivated by the tone of someoneās voice, by the urgency in their screeching throat, then you are in a self-induced coma. You are not an awakened human being. Stay away from me or Iāll have you locked up.
I back away from the keyboard before I send all that.
I see that Iām reacting.
I start to worry about how upset Iāve made myself and how it will impact the work I have to do. I am now considering cancelling some of my work today. Then my anger turns from hot to cold. Iāve worn myself out, mentally. Iāve descended from wired-up to just mildly unraveled. I am slumping in my chair. I re-read his words.
Then I realize I have a choice. I donāt have to react to this guy. I can do the opposite.
If only I can remember the opposite.
What is the opposite of reacting? Oh, right! Creating! I can create. Reacting and creating have the exact same letters in them. That helps me remember.
Deep breath. Okay. What do I want to create?
How about I create a relationship? Why not shoot for that? I could create a bond with him, maybe, based on my desire to serve people. Am I shooting for the moon with that? So what? President Kennedy got a lot of mileage out of shooting for the moon.
But weāre not off to a good start, this guy and me, I have to acknowledge that. Am I even sure heās still alive? He said he felt like killing himself after listening to me.
Iām sure that was just an expression. Okay. I will see what I can create.
So I write back. I decide to be completely honest.
I say, āDear Harmon,ā (because his name is Harmon) āI hear you. In fact, I agree with you. My early recordings are just flat out bad. I think the current ones are getting better, but I could be fooling myself. I have to say I appreciate people like you who have the courage to reach out and tell me the truth. You are helping me get better. I am sorry for your negative experience and I want to make it up to you. If you send me your mailing address, Iāll send my two latest books to you. You can read those to yourself at your own chosen speed. Thanks for taking the time to communicate with me.ā
This is my response to Harmon. A few days go by and I get an email from him: āWell, that was unexpected. I must say you take criticism pretty well. Was I too negative? I do like your books. Did I tell you that? I enjoy reading them.ā
I send two books out to him. A relationship is being created. Created! In the old days I would have just gone with my first reaction.4
If you enjoyed this, I’m sure you will enjoy the rest of Crazy Good and some of Steve Chandlers other work.
New articles #
I have concluded/aborted my writing challenge and rounded off the article accordingly.
I also played around with the format of this newsletter. Like this, it was more fun for me to write and (hopefully for you to readš.)
All the best,
Jonathan
PS: Please let me know if you have any comments, feedback or criticism.
I had an intense day implementing ES based search for my note-taking system. Besides that I worked on my Emacs setup, getting it to the point where I can do more tasks from inside of it. ↩︎
Paper trading means I’m using the same software, but am not using real money. ↩︎
I’m thinking of something like a Wikipedia pact or Beeminder. ↩︎
Crazy Good - Steve Chandler Pages 37-39 ↩︎